Home > commentary > Brian McLaren on Constructive Dialogue

Brian McLaren on Constructive Dialogue

“The Anglicans and Episcopalians have tremendous resources in liturgy and worship, and one group we all need to hear from are the Anabaptists, because they have a tradition of not killing each other. Presbyterians have a great intellectual life and a rigor in approaching the Bible, and the Catholic teachings on social justice should be adopted by everyone.

“The thing that gives me hope is that there’s an attitude among Christians on the ground where so many of us are sick of the kind of debates and fights that cause Christians to vilify one another.”

Such is the manner that Brian D. McLaren explains why he believes “denominations” do not have to be a “source of division, it can be a source of mutual interest and understanding.”

McLaren was recently interviewed by Jim Trageser of the North County Times, a daily newspaper that serves residents of North San Diego and Southwest Riverside counties.  On February 12 and 13, he spoke at the 36th annual convention of the Episcopal Diocese of San Diego at the First United Methodist Church in Mission Valley.

Mormons and McLaren

According to Trageser, “McLaren said even churches such as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which many mainstream Christian denominations consider outside the Christian fold, should be welcomed.”  McLaren continued, “Mormons would not endorse the historic creeds of the Christian Church. But on the other hand, I’ve had Mormon folks contact me who’ve read my books, and I’ve found nothing but openness and curiosity about what I’m saying.”

Responding to those coming from an unchurched background

McLaren is founding pastor of Cedar Ridge Community Church, a non-denomination church, began in 1986.  As a pastor, McLaren explained, most of the people who came to Cedar Ridge seeking truth were from an unchurched background, not from another denomination.  As a result, their questions were greatly different from those raised within a faith tradition.  This experience caused McLaren to ponder and reflect on his own faith.

“When people are coming to the faith from outside it, a lot of it just doesn’t make sense. The more I considered their questions, the more I questioned my own faith. It created a crisis of faith for me —- I had to take apart my own theology, scrutinize it and put it back together again.

“That struggle, as I sensed the growing gap between where people in churches are and people outside churches are —- that became the struggle that was expressed in my first book.”

He stepped down from pastor in 2004 to devote time to writing and speaking.  While McLaren remains a controversial figure among the Evangelical community, his message resonates greatly with a new generation of unchurched “spiritual seekers” that are considering what Christianity offers.  Read the whole article here.

About these ads
  1. February 19, 2010 at 11:01 pm | #1

    McLaren’s “Generous Orthodoxy” is probably one of the five books that has most changed the way I look at faith. I love him.

  2. February 21, 2010 at 3:49 pm | #2

    aquinas, to be candid, concerning his latest book, written here in 2010 . . . I can’t stand it. I can’t stomach it. I can hardly express to you how difficult it is for me to see how this man seeks to dismantle the precious truths of Christianity that set me free. And McLaren seeks to do it in the name of “Christianity.”

    Of course, Mormon philosophers will love McClaren. This is a no brainer. They are on the same page. I don’t know if McClaren realizes this, but both groups agree that historical Christianity has been hijacked by Greek/Roman corruption. I cannot more heartily disagree.

  3. February 21, 2010 at 4:13 pm | #3

    Sarah, thanks for the comment. I’ll add that book to my long reading list.

    Todd, thanks for your candid feelings. I’m aware that not every Evangelical supports McLaren and that he remains a controversial figure for some. Still, I felt this was newsworthy to report and that Latter-day Saints should hear about other Christian writers who have a different attitude towards these issues. Also, I want to stress that McLaren didn’t say Mormon philosophers were enjoying his books, he just said Mormon folks. Did you disagree with everything in the article?

  4. February 21, 2010 at 4:37 pm | #4

    No, not everything. I love some of the Anabaptist heritage. Some of those radicals I greatly respect and consider them among my Christian heritage.

    I might get mad at McLaren’s ideas. Very mad. But may the Spirit keep me from going bad. I can’t go out and just start killing as they did in bygone days (chuckling). The war is with the pen, and besides, I preached the glorious Romans 12 text this morning. Love is the big idea, and overcoming evil with good; rich exegetical material for Anabaptists.

  5. February 21, 2010 at 5:01 pm | #5

    Todd, can I ask what you don’t like about McLaren besides that he thinks that historical Christianity has been hijacked? I don’t agree with him on everything, but I do always find him to be gracious and thought-provoking.

  6. February 22, 2010 at 10:39 am | #6

    Sarah, every time I read his books, his ideas provoke me and get me worked up.

    But I won’t hide his books under a brown paper bag (for his humor – see here).

    His books reveal that he has completely abandoned his earlier fundamentalist Christianity and what I consider fundamental to Christianity. While Brian would “graciously” urge me to cast off the corrupt lens in how I view God and His works in the Bible, I cling to fundamentals that are so simple and so deliciously black and white about God and His glorious, loving gospel.

    Perhaps, I can highlight some quotes in his book, A New Christianity, that trouble me.

  7. February 22, 2010 at 2:55 pm | #7

    Todd, I’m very interested in hearing which quotes trouble you, but maybe you should email it, if it would hijack aquinas’s thread… :)

  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
%d bloggers like this: